Remmy’s review of Avatar


Avatar, 18 December 2009, rated PG-13. When I first saw the 2 hours and 42-minute playtime of the movie, I thought for sure that Kevin Coster was in it. It was very long for any movie. I have heard several opinions of this movie, some saying it was a Custers Last Stand remake and other such nonsense.

It was not. I suppose if you take the movie out of context you can come up with different things, like the United States attacking Japan in World War Two, or the Romans descending on Gaul (we call it France now.) Those heathens right? Nope. Although the Gaul did attack many Roman villages until the Romans got fed up with the murder and theft.

No, this movie stands on its own. Beautiful colors, beautiful sets, great artwork, directing, For a list of most of its awards follow this link

This is an original film, nothing compares to it. I rate it 5 out of 5 stars.

I do not have my normal video of this because Disney/FOX blocked it on copyright violation both are Chinese owned. Please tell Disney/FOX they are out of line. Sony Also Chinese/Japanese does the same thing so please tell them how displeased you are!

Please follow and like us:

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

2 thoughts on “Remmy’s review of Avatar

  1. Steven Fritchie

    This is a good movie, but it can also be considered as an epic due to its length. The acting was good and the CGI was very good. The main message about this movie that I’ve always heard was that it is a movie dealing with big corporations destroying the environment. If this is true then the message was a little heavy-handed.
    I can’t imagine anyone who hasn’t seen this movie come away without having an opinion about its meaning. Like art and music, people will form their own opinions. This does, however, have good entertainment value.

Leave a Reply